About Me

Equity Analysts and sports fans, always looking for a new market to beat. We are contrarian style bettors, focusing on isolating value when public perception has created dislocation in a market. We blend statistical models and spot systems with market analysis (looking for situations where sharp money comes against public money) to make our selections. We primarily focus on NFL, NBA, and Tennis. Soccer is a specialty as well, but at this point we are not confident in saying we have a LT ROI + edge on that front.

Monday, February 17, 2020

Tennis Bets for 2/17-2/23 (Rio + Del Rey + Marseille)

Tennis Blog for the week of 2/17 thru 2/23. Will post all picks + analysis for those 3 tournaments here below, starting with futures plays. Picks will appear with most recent at the top (with each successive day being filled in above the other). You can track our picks on twitter (with timestamps for those wanting to check fidelity) @RLM_Disciple

Tennis Bet Card for Monday 2/17 (2-0, +$2.1)
Gerasimov ML vs Ruus (+110) $1.0 / $1.1
✅Ymer ML vs Gasquet (-135) $2.0 / $1.5

Vondrousova ML x Garin ML (-120) $1.2 / $1.0
Barrere ML vs Paire (+120) $1.2 / $1.0
Verdasco ML vs Andujar (-160) $1.6 / $1.0
Baena +2.5 gm vs Delbonis (-120) $1.2 / $1.0
Baena ML (+130) $0.5 / $0.65

Mannarino ML vs Kwon (Pick) $1.0 / $1.0


Futures for Mon 2/17 - Sun 2/23 
Mannarino to win Del Rey Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0
Fucsovics to win ATP Marseille (+2800) $0.5 / $14.0
Auger to win Quarter (+225) $1.0 / $2.25
Fucsovics to win Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0


Handicaps for Monday 2/17:

(6 AM) Gerasimov vs Ruusuvuori (Gerasimov ML @ +110)
The quick courts will suit Gerasimov’s game-style here and he shows a substantial edge in Trailing Indoor Hard-Court Data and Common Opponent performance. Gerasimov has roughly equal serve performance over the past 1Y / 6M in ATP tour level matches on Indoor Hard court but has a +7.5% / +9% Serve Break delta across those two data horizons. 

Against common opponents, Gerasimov has positive Serve Hold / Break deltas of +4.7% and +10.2%. Model prices him as a significant favorite, and while Ruusuvuori ultimately has the higher ceiling and is the better-known name at this point, I’ll take my chances with Gerasimov ML


(9 AM) Mikael Ymer vs Richard Gasquet (Ymer ML @ -135)

Ymer comes in on an upswing, having seemingly made the break from Challenger dominant to Tour level player. He’s won 7/11 matches in the last 3M and has shown a steady 6M uptrend not only in the level of his play, but his ability to rise to the level of strong quality opponents. Gasquet will always be talented and dangerous, but he comes off a year severely hampered by injuries and has only played 3 matches in the last 3M (2-1). Notably, Gasquet DID NOT look very healthy the last time out a week ago (retired down 6-1 / 1-0). The speed of these courts typically rewards attacking play, but Ymer can counterpunch well and loves an indoor court (16-6 last 1Y across all levels). His ability to draw Gasquet into longer rallies will put pressure on an ailing body and should give him an edge that escalates the longer the match wears on.

Looking at trailing data, Ymer is a deserved favorite. Hold / Break delta’s vs. Ymer over the past 1Y (-10% / +11%) and 6M (-4.5% / +14%) actually show him to be the better player in this matchup, and that data is not adjusting fully for Gasquet’s current condition. Against Common Opponents, Hold / Break numbers are relatively even (-8.2% / +8.8%), but this data is actually skewed out towards Gasquet’s 2018 and 2017 statistics, and still shows a slight edge to Ymer.

Combined model forecasts a +3.3% serve delta to Ymer, without adjusting for Gasquet injury concerns. That would make Ymer a 70% win chance and a -240 ML favorite in a 3 set match. I am surprised to see him model out as such a strong favorite to begin with, but the bias would be to adjust that even further in Ymer’s direction. 


Gasquet really can’t tolerate a physical match here. Obviously Gasquet could feel well off 7 days of rest and put forth a strong showing here, but that is a tail risk and we are essentially getting a free roll on his body wearing down through the match as I would make Ymer the favorite even absent those concerns. Obviously try to place this wager that pays out on retirements (most pay out after 1 set complete and some pay out as long as the match starts), but it may be worth staking a split between 1st Set and 2nd Set ML’s as part of the overall wager to ensure some cash flow if Gasquet retires after losing a set.

(11:30 AM) Vondrousova vs Sevastova (Vondrousova ML @ -215 in parlay)
Vondrousova has significantly better hard-court data over the past year and Sevastova comes in having lost 7 of her last 8 main draw matches. Vondrousova is 10-4 over the past 1Y on hard courts while Sevastova comes in 4-12.

The two profile more evenly against common opponents, but Vondrousova dominated their H2H on clay last year (63% serve points / 56% return points) and the translation from Clay to Hard is kinder to Vondrousova than Sevastova, despite Vondrousova being known as a clay court specialist. Sevastova has to be highly motivated here, but this is a terrible matchup for her, and I expect Vondrousova to progress with ease.

(2:30 PM) Christian Garin vs Andrej Martin (Garin ML @ -400 in parlay)
Garin is poised to break out and enter the top 20 during the 2020 clay swing and features substantially better trailing data than Martin (+9.3% Hold / +2.5% Break delta over 1Y, +5% Hold / +14% Break delta’s over L6 months). The two played a couple weeks ago, with Martin actually taking the first set before Garin won both subsequent sets by a 6-2 score line. Garin was clearly struggling with something physical early in that match, and I believe the final 2 sets of that match tell the true story of this matchup (they played rather close to my forecast for this match based off trailing data). The courts here favor more attacking tennis, and that will benefit Garin more than Martin relative to the conditions in their last matchup.

(1 PM) Benoit Paire vs Gregoire Barrere (Barrere ML +120)
Paire has been in awful form since his final’s appearance in Auckland, having won just a single match over 3 tournaments. Barrere comes in on a confidence boosting run, winning multiple main draw matches and notching the biggest win of his career vs. Dimitrov 2 weeks ago.

Trailing data favors Barrere. He sports +8% Hold / +2.5% Break deltas on Indoor hard over the past 1Y, and +3% Hold / +3.3% break against a sample of common opponents on Indoor AND Outdoor hard courts over the past 1Y (Indoor is clearly a superior surface for Barrere and an inferior surface for Paire, so this is surprising and indicative). 

The two played a H2H on Indoor hard in 2019, with Paire winning in 2 tight sets. While Paire won +10% serve points in that match, that was relatively early in Barrere’s career arc w/ respect to main draw ATP events and the first set did go to a tiebreak. That match also took place during Paire’s best run of form in 2019 (mid-summer). Since then, trajectories are almost diametrically opposite, with Barrere now a more polished + confident player with weapons and an ability to dictate points in fast conditions. Paire’s forehand remains a real weakness and that weakness is particularly evident on faster courts, where he has less time to prepare + wind up - Barrere should be able attack that side on serve and control points and we should see a fair number of errors from Paire on that side

Paire also tends to freeze up in high pressure situations or in the face of high expectations. Barrere also struggles wit pressure but came through that situation vs. Dimitrov very well, and I suspect that Paire will actually be feeling some mental heat during this match. My Historical Stats model prices him at 70% / -250, my Common Opponent model prices him at 63% / -170, while my H2H model prices him at 32% / +215. Combined model gives Barrere a 54% chance of winning, pricing him at -120 on the ML and giving us some value on that side. Worth taking a stab at Barrere ML +130 or better – scary proposition given the 0-1 H2H and name brand disparity, but he is the better player indoors and carries both the confidence + toolbox necessary to put serious pressure on Paire here


Pablo Andujar vs Fernando Verdasco (Verdasco ML @ -160)
These two profile relatively evenly on Clay courts, with Verdasco holding a +4.3% Hold / -1.5% Break delta over the past 1Y. That’s where the similarities end as they relate to this matchup, however, as Verdasco crushed Andujar in Common Opponent performance (+16.5% Hold / +4.2% Break deltas) and has gotten the better of their H2H history. These two haven’t played on Clay in a while, but they Verdasco dismantled Andujar on Hard courts last summer, winning 75% of serve points and 40% of return points. Even adjusting for the translation from Hard to Clay (Verdasco is a better hard-court player, roughly equal on Clay), I still forecast a +11% serve point win rate delta on a Clay. 

Important to note here are both the court conditions (fast / bouncy / favor attacking tennis) and the weather conditions (hot and humid). The court will likely play a little bit closer to a Hard court than a slower Clay court (like Buenos Aires) and that definitely favors Verdasco. He owned the H2H on Hard in 2019 and features +13% / +0.5% Serve / Hold deltas on that surface. He will be able to dictate points and play first strike tennis in these conditions, and that should carry him to victory. 

(2:30 PM) Roberto Carballes Baena vs Federico Delbonis (Baena +2.5 @ -120 / Baena ML @ +130)
Both players are on rather indifferent form, with Baena running into the Ruud rocket ship in Buenos Aires and Delbonis looking devoid of rhythm in his first 3 Clay court matches of the year. Notably, Delbonis has looked less than fully fit, often struggling the deeper it goes into a set or match. That will not play well in Rio, where it will be near 90F and 30C with 75% humidity. 
Trailing data favors Baena on Clay courts, showing a +2% Serve Hold / +2.5% Serve break delta in his favor over the past 1Y, while Common Opponents show roughly equal performance (+3% Serve Hold / -3% Break delta). The internals of the data favor Baena, as he consistently performs better on key points (Break point save rate +6-7% / conversion +5%) and he thus models out as a 60% favorite off that forecast. 

H2H favors Delbonis 2-0, but the two each created 10 break point chances in their 2019 meeting with Delbonis winning it in 3 sets. That match was in Argentina, home to Delbonis and in much more temperate weather conditions. Baena is the fitter of the two, has the backhand to handle Delbonis’ cross court rally shots, with the movement and pace to counter a lot of what Delbonis’ tries to do from the baseline. Baena will extend rallies, which should draw errors from Delbonis with increasing frequency as he tires more rapidly through the match. Baena +2.5 games and Baena ML +130 are both value plays in my opinion

Mannarino vs Kwon (Mannarino ML @ Even)
Conditions will be hot + humid with wind building to a sustained 13-15 MPH by 3 PM (30 min after scheduled start). This immediately favors Mannarino, who has a 7-4 record at this venue and has shown his ability to hit consistently in adverse conditions throughout his career. He hits a very flat and low motion stroke, and this allows him to adjust well and maintain margin on his 
groundstrokes. Mannarino is not in good form, but he has come to this event on losing streaks in the past and has used the favorability of the conditions to get on a winning streak and play his way into form (he did this during the grass swing in 2019 as well). Kwon has played well in recent weeks, but is truly a baseliner and I’m not sure of how well he will handle the funky nature of the courts and conditions in Del Rey.

Mannarino profiles as a winner in this match of Trailing 1Y / 6M data, with -2% Hold / +4% Break and -2% Hold / +3% Break delta’s across those 2 samples. He has also outperformed significantly against Common Opponents, nothing roughly equal serving rates but breaking serve over 20% more frequently. 


Overall, my forecasts project Mannarino as a solid favorite here, and the additional edge via the conditions + familiarity with the venue warrants a play on his ML @ Even odds.




Futures for Mon 2/17 - Sun 2/23 

Mannarino to win Del Rey Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0
Fucsovics to win ATP Marseille (+2800) $0.5 / $14.0
Auger to win Quarter (+225) $1.0 / $2.25
Fucsovics to win Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0

Futures Handicaps:


Auger Alliasime to win Q and ATP Marseille:

  • Auger-Aliassime may have been soundly beaten in the final this week, but he put forth another very impressive Indoor Hard display and his data is now very strong on this surface across a relatively larger sample. He will need to beat Travaglia, and then Herbert / Kukushkin to make the quarterfinal, and I expect relatively little resistance as he has major edges against all 3 on trailing data. He would then need to beat Goffin, who is one player with shockingly poor Indoor data given his ranking and general competency on Hard Courts. Auger wins a combined +5.4% Serve / Return points than the average tour player and Holds + Breaks at a +6.6% higher rate than the average tour player (vs. Goffin at +1.7% / +3%). That means the gap between Auger and the average player is 3x bigger that Goffin’s outperformance on Serve + Return Points won %, and 2x bigger on Serve + Return Games won %. He may be tired, but Auger is clearly the best player on this surface within this quadrant of the draw
Fucsovics to win Q and ATP Marseille
  • Fucsovics will need to beat an unpredictable Bublik, then Paire / Barrere, and then either Shapovalov / Cilic. Bublik has terrible indoor hard-court data, and Fucsovics should handle him on current form. I expect Barrere to put up a good fight vs. Paire, and he has a very good chance to progress from that matchup, but neither of them stacks up to Fucs on Indoor data either. That leaves a likely ¼ matchup with Shapovalov to close the deal. Shap has been awful this year, showing serious weakness on return and the inability to maintain focus for full sets, much less full matches. Fucsovics screens slightly worse on Dominance Ratio for Games Won but is better on Dominance Ratio for Points Won and arguably comes in with more confidence / form – he appears to have turned a corner coming into this season. Shapovalov struggles on super-fast surfaces as his backhand requires a longer windup and that severely compromises his ability to get into points on return. Fucsovics should clear the first two rounds, and that will leave us with an EV+ ML bet vs. Shapovalov in the ¼ final.
  • See below the draw split by quarter (indicated by shading in left most column) and then sub sorted to reflect best statistics within each quarter of the draw at the top
Image

Mannarino to Win Quarter
  • Mannarino presents an interesting option on a “To Win Quarter” prop, as his path is littered with matchup specific advantages and the conditions suit him well. He is historically a player who excels when conditions are downright terrible and is 7-4 at this venue. 
  • His stats profile surprisingly well (he has the highest Hold + Break ratio on outdoor hard in his bracket) and he looks to be the one player in that corner of the draw who has a proven track record of handling bad conditions / wind with success. 
  • Kwon looks to be the toughest matchup on paper, but he lacks the backhand to consistently cope with the angles Mannarino can create (especially in windier conditions), and Mannarino actually profiles very well in our model simulation of that match and we will likely be considering him on the ML. Behind that, he likely faces Dzumhur (3-0 in ATP H2H’s on Hard, +23% Serve Win delta) and then would finish with Opelka. Mannarino lost a tight H2H to Opelka early in 2019 on Indoor Hard, taking the first set but then losing the match 6-3 / 6-7 / 4-6. 
  • However, Mannarino won only -1% less serve points in that match despite serving at a substantially lower accuracy rate than his 1Y avg. Normalizing for typical accuracy and the deltas between Indoor and Outdoor performance, Mannarino actually comes out +3% in our forecast and we project him as a -200 favorite in the simulation. 
Image


  • See below the draw split by quarter (indicated by shading in left most column) and then sub sorted to reflect best statistics within each quarter of the draw at the top
Image

Sunday, February 16, 2020

Preview Montpellier + Del Rey + Rio and Recap 2/10 - 2/16

Fantastic way to cap off the week - we cashed big on our 2 futures / outright recommendations this week and are glad to see some of the pre-tournament work pay off. We isolated some huge value on Ruud to make his semi-final and win the tournament outright, and were 100% correct on Ruud being undervalued in the market, but also benefited significantly from the draw breaking our way (which we highlighted as a key benefit of the play)

Week in review and up to date season statistics for our Tennis bets in the attached doc below. Previews + Futures recommendations for upcoming tournaments (Montpellier + Del Rey + Rio) will follow below that insert. 


Image


Previews + Futures Picks: Montpellier + Del Rey + Rio
Surface speed and ace rate statistics are inserted below here. Tournament specific players stats, draw commentary, and futures picks will follow behind that.

Image


Futures for Mon 2/17 - Sun 2/23 
Mannarino to win Del Rey Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0
Fucsovics to win ATP Marseille (+2800) $0.5 / $14.0
Auger to win Quarter (+225) $1.0 / $2.25

Fucsovics to win Quarter (+500) $1.0 / $5.0

ATP Marseille Surface Notes + Preview (Fucsovics and Auger to Win Quarter)
Marseille is played indoors on a faster hard-court surface – 13.4% Ace rate in 2019 ranked 10th out of 38 HC venues while the average court speed over the past 3Y ranks 12th out of 38. Service hold rates have generally been high at this tournament and we’ve seen serve / attack-oriented players do well here. That typically yields little chance for a long-shot surprise winner, as this tournament requires a player to simply outplay and outhit an opponent for 4-5 matches in a row and that is really tough if you aren’t one of the more talented players in the field

Looking at the draw, several players stand out on Indoor specific trailing data relative to their seeding for this tournament. Pospisil, Fucsovics, Auger, Bedene and Sinner have generally performed above their seeding level on Indoor Hard. Paire, Hurkacz, Cilic, Goffin, Shapovalov and Khachanov (on more recent 1Y data that is more reflective of form) are surprisingly poor with respect to how they are positioned in the draw. Notably, Hurkacz is way worse on Indoor vs. Outdoor hard courts and that will be something to watch over the next year. These are the players we will look to fade on our futures plays and selectively during the week. 


Medvedev is clearly the cream of the crop, but it doesn’t appear he is carrying the form of Summer 2019 when he accumulated most of his spectacular data. Pospisil profiles as the 2nd most dangerous player but picked up an injury in his last match and its unclear how that will affect him. Tsitsi has been struggling with a shoulder injury as well. With that said, this smells like a pretty open draw, and we have two solid “to win Quarter” props to attack here that we will also back to win the title.



Fucsovics and Auger to Win Quarter and ATP Montpellier Outright
  • When we look at the data split out by ¼ of the draw, there are two clear winners in their respective quarters that are not being priced appropriately by oddsmakers. 
  • Auger-Aliassime may have been soundly beaten in the final this week, but he put forth another very impressive Indoor Hard display and his data is now very strong on this surface across a relatively larger sample. He will need to beat Travaglia, and then Herbert / Kukushkin to make the quarterfinal, and I expect relatively little resistance as he has major edges against all 3 on trailing data. He would then need to beat Goffin, who is one player with shockingly poor Indoor data given his ranking and general competency on Hard Courts. Auger wins a combined +5.4% Serve / Return points than the average tour player and Holds + Breaks at a +6.6% higher rate than the average tour player (vs. Goffin at +1.7% / +3%). That means the gap between Auger and the average player is 3x bigger that Goffin’s outperformance on Serve + Return Points won %, and 2x bigger on Serve + Return Games won %. He may be tired, but Auger is clearly the best player on this surface within this quadrant of the draw
  • Fucsovics will need to beat an unpredictable Bublik, then Paire / Barrere, and then either Shapovalov / Cilic. Bublik has terrible indoor hard-court data, and Fucsovics should handle him on current form. I expect Barrere to put up a good fight vs. Paire, and he has a very good chance to progress from that matchup, but neither of them stacks up to Fucs on Indoor data either. That leaves a likely ¼ matchup with Shapovalov to close the deal. Shap has been awful this year, showing serious weakness on return and the inability to maintain focus for full sets, much less full matches. Fucsovics screens slightly worse on Dominance Ratio for Games Won but is better on Dominance Ratio for Points Won and arguably comes in with more confidence / form – he appears to have turned a corner coming into this season. Shapovalov struggles on super-fast surfaces as his backhand requires a longer windup and that severely compromises his ability to get into points on return. Fucsovics should clear the first two rounds, and that will leave us with an EV+ ML bet vs. Shapovalov in the ¼ final.
  • See below the draw split by quarter (indicated by shading in left most column) and then sub sorted to reflect best statistics within each quarter of the draw at the top
Image


ATP Del Ray Surface Notes + Preview

Del Ray is a slow, higher bouncing surface (28th rank avg speed out of 38 over last 3Y) that does yield a fairly high % of aces, although this is down more to the field composition than anything else. 

Tournament is held in Miami, which means wind is usually a factor in afternoon and early evening matches – we will need to be on top of the forecasts this week. Those surface dynamics make it profitable to back strong movers / defenders, while the courts here also reward some of the same characteristics as clay courts do (similar to Indian Wells, which Thiem won last year). At the same time, these conditions are likely more favorable for the Opelka / Isner / Raonic types than NYC, as the higher bounce / slower courts will help them in rallies while their ace rates will likely remain high (taking some wind pressure off their ground strokes).


Mannarino to Win Quarter



  • Mannarino presents an interesting option on a “To Win Quarter” prop, as his path is littered with matchup specific advantages and the conditions suit him well. He is historically a player who excels when conditions are downright terrible and is 7-4 at this venue. 
  • His stats profile surprisingly well (he has the highest Hold + Break ratio on outdoor hard in his bracket) and he looks to be the one player in that corner of the draw who has a proven track record of handling bad conditions / wind with success. 
  • Kwon looks to be the toughest matchup on paper, but he lacks the backhand to consistently cope with the angles Mannarino can create (especially in windier conditions), and Mannarino actually profiles very well in our model simulation of that match and we will likely be considering him on the ML. Behind that, he likely faces Dzumhur (3-0 in ATP H2H’s on Hard, +23% Serve Win delta) and then would finish with Opelka. Mannarino lost a tight H2H to Opelka early in 2019 on Indoor Hard, taking the first set but then losing the match 6-3 / 6-7 / 4-6. 
  • However, Mannarino won only -1% less serve points in that match despite serving at a substantially lower accuracy rate than his 1Y avg. Normalizing for typical accuracy and the deltas between Indoor and Outdoor performance, Mannarino actually comes out +3% in our forecast and we project him as a -200 favorite in the simulation. 
Image


  • See below the draw split by quarter (indicated by shading in left most column) and then sub sorted to reflect best statistics within each quarter of the draw at the top
Image

ATP Rio De Janeiro Surface Notes + Preview


Rio profiles as a slower Clay court surface (speed rank 17th of 21, ace rank 15th of 21), generally favors more attacking tennis than Buenos Aires the week before (similar speed rating, much higher ace rate). Matches are usually very physical given the heat and humidity, so fitness will need to be considered in every match. We will look to back players who benefit from a relatively springy court that rewards big hitting and serving. Thiem seems a lock to win this week, provided he is fit after a deep and taxing run at AO. 


Sunday, February 9, 2020

Recap 2/3 - 2/9: ATP Pune, Montpellier, Cordoba

Picks and commentary on the blog dropped off slightly this week - I was travelling most of the week on business and had a trip planned for the weekend so I decided to keep it on twitter and update here on Sunday to save some time (traffic flow is way heavier to that side anyways)

The week was rather lukewarm for the majority of the early rounds, but we did identity two value outright / future plays that outperformed their market pricing. Londero (+2000) made it to a QF and lost a tight match in a 3rd set breaker. Gerasimov (+1500) progressed all the way to the final and was a substantial favorite to win the match. Hopefully you all got some hedges down - my apologies for not posting any hedging guidelines - the match went off at 4:30 AM my local time. 


The draw played out exactly as we had hoped - Paire decides to throw a clunker as the 1st seed (classic) completely opening the draw. Gerasimov worked through some slow starts but his serve / attack skills played really well on this surface and he looked rather dominant in most of his victories. We yet again had a nice little run to close the week, and are feeling confident that we should be able to continue driving some positive returns here as we begin to accumulate some actually relevant form data for the clay court players and get a sense for how the trends we noticed during the hard court swings of late 2019 / early 2020 manifest themselves on a new surface. On to the next week, see the entire rolodex of our picks for this week below: 



Season Review
  • YTD (thru 2/9) = 100-75, +$20.45 Units
    • Aussie Open = 69 - 49, +$19.05
    • Week Total (2/3 - 2/9) = 22-16, +$4.85
  • Futures Record (0-2, -$1.5 units)
ATP Pune, Montpellier, Cordoba Results (2/3 - 2/9) = 22-16, +$4.85
  • Week Total (2/3 - 2/9) = 22-16, +$4.85
  • Futures Record (0-2, -$1.5 units)

Tennis Bet Card for Sun 2/9 (4-0, +$6.25 units)
Bagnis ML x Schwartz / Garin O2.5 sets (+280) $0.5 / $1.4
Garin / Schwartz O2.5 sets (+160) $1.0 / $1.6
Garin +3.5 gm (-105) $1.05 / $1.0
Garin ML (+225) $1.0 / $2.25

Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9  (0-2, -$1.5 units)
✖️Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
--->✖️Hedge Duckworth Live ML (+450) $0.5 / $2.25
✖️Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Week to date (2/3 - 2/9) = 22-16, +$4.85
Year to Date (thru 2/9) = 100-75, +$20.45 Units 
Futures Record (0-2, -$1.5 units)

Tennis Bet Card for Saturday 2/8 (3-2, +$1.4)
Barrere ML vs Zandschlup (-155) $1.55 / $1.0
Barrere -1.5 gm $0.55 / $0.5
✖️Krajinovic +1.5 gm vs Monfils (-110) $1.1 / $1.0
Garin ML x Schwartz ML (-135) $1.35 / $1.0

Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9  (0-1, -$1 units)
⚡️ Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
--->✖️Hedge Duckworth Live ML (+450) $0.5 / $2.25
✖️Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Week to date = 18-16, -$1.4
Year to Date (prior to this week) = 78-59, +$15.6 Units 
Futures Record (0-1, -$1.0)

Tennis Bet Card for Thursday 2/6 (5-6, -$1.05)
✖️Ymer ML vs Kraj (+120) $1.5 / $1.8
✖️Ymer / Kraj O22.5 (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
✖️Ruusuvuori -2.5 vs Gombos (-120) $1.2 / $1.0
Kwon ML vs Gunneswaran (-140) $1.4 / $1.0
Gerasimov ML (-190) $1.9 / $1.0
✖️Gerasimov -1.5 set (+140) $0.5 / $0.7
Auger / Herbert O23 (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
Ramos ML vs Andujar (-140) $1.4 / $1.0
Londero -1.5 sets (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
✖️Munar +1.5 set vs Schwartz (-105) $1.05 / $1.0
✖️Munar ML vs Schwartz (+260) $0.5 / $1.3

Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9 
⚡️ Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
⚡️ Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Week to date = 15-16, -$2.8
Year to Date (prior to this week) = 78-59, +$15.6 Units 

Tennis Results for Wednesday 2/5 (3-3, -$0.55)
✖️Stebe / Berankis O22.5 (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
(P) Sugita ML vs Troicki (-180) $1.8 / $2.0
(P) Sugita -2 gm (-135) $1.35 / $1.0
✖️Shapovalov -2.5 (-115) $1.15 / $1.0
✖️Shap / Pospisil O22.5 (-135) $1.35 / $100
Moutet ML vs Pella (+115) $1.5 / $1.7
Garin ML vs Balasz (-185) $0.92 /$0.5
Garin -2.5 vs Balasz (-125) $1.25 / $1.0

Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9 
⚡️ Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
⚡️ Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Week to date = 10-10, -$1.75
Year to Date (prior to this week) = 78-59, +$15.6 Units 

Tennis Results for Tuesday 2/4 (4-3, +$0.05)

Gerasimov ML x Ivashka ML (+110) $1.1 / $1.0
Ruus ML vs Novak (-160) $1.6 / $1.0
✖️Sinner ML vs Ymer (-155) $1.55 / $1.0
✖️Sinner -2 vs Ymer (-120) $0.6 / $0.5
✖️Stakhovsky / Herbert O22 (-120) $1.8 / $1.5
Ramos ML vs Bagnis (-200) $1.0 / $0.5
(P) Ramos -3 gm (120) $0.6 / 0.5
Londero -1.5 gm vs Cecchinato (-115) 1.75 / $1.5


Tennis Results for Sun 2/2 - Mon 2/3 (3-4, -1.25)
Bagnis ML vs Martinez (-150) $1.5 / $1.0
✖️ Bagnis ML x Mena +3.5 x Johnson ML $0.5 / $1.8
 Bagnis ML vs Gaio (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
Ruusuvuori ML x Sugita ML (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
✖️Sonego -1.5 gm vs Balazs (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
✖️Delbonis ML vs Cuevas (-140) $1.4 / $1.0
✖️Delbonis -1.5 gm vs Cuevas (-110) $1.1 / $1.0

Week to date = 3-4, -$1.25
Year to Date (prior to this week) = 78-59, +$15.6 Units 



Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Tennis Picks for Tuesday 2/4

Not a great afternoon for the tennis, as our last two plays failed to cash. Sonego was a mess on the clay surface and we will be avoiding him until he's show that his footwork has adjusted to the surface. Delbonis had his chances but missed on numerous BP opportunities, even failing to break from 0-40 multiple times. He faded down the stretch after losing the first set - we were clearly on the wrong side there.

Still have two active futures plays and it looks like the market is moving Gerasimov's line in a favorable direction (now 2nd favorite at 8-1, before even playing a match). The write ups for the futures can be found at the bottom of this post, and in the Monday 2/3 post alongside the Tournament Specific Surface preview.


Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9 

Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Tennis Results for Sun 2/2 - Mon 2/3 (3-4, -1.25)

✅Bagnis ML vs Martinez (-150) $1.5 / $1.0
✖️ Bagnis ML x Mena +3.5 x Johnson ML $0.5 / $1.8
✅ Bagnis ML vs Gaio (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
✅Ruusuvuori ML x Sugita ML (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
✖️Sonego -1.5 gm vs Balazs (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
✖️Delbonis ML vs Cuevas (-140) $1.4 / $1.0
✖️Delbonis -1.5 gm vs Cuevas (-110) $1.1 / $1.0

Week to date = 3-4, -$1.25

Year to Date (prior to this week) = 78-59, +$15.6 Units 

Tennis Bets for Tue 2/4

Gerasmimov ML x Ivashka ML (+110) $1.0 / $1.1
Ruusuvuori ML vs Novak (-160) $1.6 / $1.0
Sinner ML vs Ymer (-155) $1.55 / $1.0
Sinner -2 gm (-120) $0.6 / $0.5
Herbert / Stakhovsky O22 (-120) $1.8 / $1.5
Ramos ML vs Bagnis (-200) $1.0 / $0.5
Ramos -3 gm (-120) $0.6 / $0.5
Londero -1.5 gm vs Cecchinato $1.15 / $1.0



Handicaps for Tuesday's Bets:

Paolo Lorenzi vs Egor Gerasimov (Gerasimov ML x Ivashka ML)

Gerasimov with a big edge vs. Common Opponents on Hard Courts, holding serve at a +6% higher rate and breaking serve at a +11% higher rate. Lorenzi is more of a clay courter, and will not be suited by the speed of the courts in Pune (altitude and a generally fast surface). He is also 38 years old and has hit a very poor run of form. Gerasimov, on the other hand, has put forth his best ATP level performances on the Asian / Indoor Hard swing in late 2019 - those courts are generally considered the fastest on tour, and I expect Gerasimov's game to be very difficult to handle this week given the conditions.

Ilya Ivashka vs Evgeny Donskoy (Gerasimov ML x Ivashka ML)

Ivashka is clearly the better player on return of serve (+7% / +5% Serve Break rate on 1Y Stats / Common Opponent) and his more recent data shows him performing better on serve as well (+2% Serve Hold on 6M stats, +4% on Common Opponents). Ivashka should bring some confidence in this match off a successful AO qualifying campaign and a strong performance vs. Anderson in the first round (took him 5 sets). 

The 2 have met H2H 3 time, with Donskoy leading the series 2-1 after their last meeting in 2017. In those 3 matches, the two were roughly equal on serve with all 3 matches playing very tight. Since their last meeting, however, Ivashka’s data has consistently improved YoY while Donskoy has seemingly regressed somewhat. Accounting for their stat deltas between 2017 and 2019, I forecast a 67% Serve win rate for Ivashka vs. 59% for Donskoy (84% chance of winning implied). 



Combination of all 3 models makes Ivashka a roughly -300 / 1.33 favorite, so there is some value taking him on the ML. 



Emil Ruusuvuori vs Dennis Novak (Ruus ML @-160)
Ruusuvuori is an up and comer who will break into the top 100 this year. He destroyed the challenger tour in 2019, winning 34 of 38 matches on hard courts over the past year. He is familiar with the courts here, having played multiple tournaments here in the past 18 months, while Novak tends to struggle on indoor hard courts. Ruusuvuori is more of an attacking / offensive player, while Novak has a tendency to defend and counterpunch – on an extremely fast surface like Montpellier, this puts Novak at a distinct disadvantage

Further, Ruus has big edges in trailing hard-court data against Challenger Opponents (took out Novak’s ATP stats to account for difficulty level), Holding Serve at a +1.5% higher rate and breaking serve at a +16% higher rate. The two profile similarly on serve against Common Opponents as well, but Ruus again has a substantial edge on Serve Break rate at +6%.

Combination of my 2 models gives Ruus a 73% chance of taking this match (ML = -300). I will happily take a stab at Ruus -2 game spread @-115

Jannik Sinner vs Mikael Ymer
Sinner has a +6-8% edge on Serve Holds depending upon the sample you look at, and only a 1-2% deficit on Serve Breaks. Ymer has come on strong recently and is generally a player I want to back this year, but this is a bad matchup for him. He too features a very defensive game style, preferring to use his athleticism to defend and counter punch when openings present themselves (we can see how well he fared on a super slow surface in Australia). Sinner is a big name to watch this year. He has all the weapons necessary to eventually develop into a top 10 player and has shown the ability to consistently overpower defensively oriented opponents thus far in his career. These two played a match in similarly quick Indoor conditions at the Next Gen Finals, and Ymer simply got blown off the court in that match. In match camera feeds to the conversations between the coaches and players suggested that Ymer was at something of a loss for how to combat Sinner’s game by the 3rd set. My models make Sinner a favorite with a 65% chance of winning (-190 ML), so there isn’t HUGE value on him by the numbers alone, but given the matchup dynamics and surface conditions I think this warrants a play on Sinner ML or game spread

Sergey Stakhovsky vs Pierre Herbert
My models actually make Stakhovsky a slight favorite here on 2019 data, but it is a small sample size for Stakhovsky on Indoor Hard Courts and the 2Y data look better for Herbert. It’s unrealistic to expect Stakhovsky to win here – Herbert is the better player overall and should come out on top in the end. Regardless, I think the odds should be pricing in a much closer match than it currently would appear. Both players are strongest on Serve and can win cheap points with Serve + volley tactic. Given each players weakness on return and the speed of the courts, both should cruise through their serve games, keeping this match tight and likely forcing a breaker or 2 before its settled. Herbert hasn’t played in nearly 2 weeks and isn’t used to the speed of indoor conditions. He has a tendency to get rattled when serving out sets / matches, and its very possible he comes out slow or chokes a bit here while adjusting to the surface.

Over 22 is a solid play – we should see breakers and this smells like a match going 3 sets.

Albert Ramos Vinolas vs Facundo Bagnis

Both players are clay court specialists, but Ramos is a clear level above Bagnis in terms of ability. Looking at trailing Clay court data, Ramos has a substantial edge on both serve and return across all 3 samples.

Bagnis has struggled in the past vs left handers, as his backhand and size cause him problems against players who can hit topspin up and away from him on that side. We saw this come through in their H2H in Brazil last year, where Ramos won 76% of serve points vs. 52% for Bagnis en route to a 6-1 / 6-3 victory

This will be Ramos’ first match on clay, and that is somewhat concerning given that Bagnis will be surface warm coming through qualifying. Nevertheless, I believe Ramos has enough to overcome a potential slow start and to bring home the win here.


Juan Ignacio Londero vs Marco Cecchinato
Londero comes in as a hometown favorite – he made his break through onto the tour at Cordoba last year and actually won the tournament out of nowhere. The court conditions clearly favor his more attacking gamestyle, even though it may take him a few games to get fully used to clay again (first match on surface this year). Cecchinato has lost 9 of his last 10 tour level matches vs. top 50 ranked players and must now face a dangerous player on his home turf. 


Looking at the data, Londero serves better (+9% serve hold) over the past year and the two are roughly equal on return. When filtering down to common opponents to standardize the opposition difficulty level, Londero holds serve +5% more and actually breaks serve +7% more. The H2H history gives me some pause (3-0 Cecchinato), but is frankly not as relevant as one would think (Londero was not the player he is today in 2017 and Cecchinato has regressed since that time). Totally different matchup in these conditions and at these player’s current ability levels.




Futures Bet Rationale

Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5

Egor Gerasimov is a player to keep an eye on, particularly in 3 set formats on faster hard courts. He is generally weaker than most re: fitness (this showed after a few matches at AO), but this hasn’t impacted him in the 3 set format. 

Gerasimov has a missile of a serve and features solid ground strokes and the ability to finish points at the net. He had a strong finish to 2019 on the latter portion of the hard court swing, and has the ability to get on the type of serve heater that could carry him deep into this tournament. At +1500, I'm willing to take a small shot at him to win this event. 


Pune at a higher altitude than most tournaments (500M / 1640 ft) and the courts / balls here have played fast in prior years. Sean Calvert points out that 56% of matches played at Pune over the last 2Y have featured a tiebreak, evidence of the serve friendly conditions. Further, Karlovic (another serve oriented missile) had great run here in 2019, making the final as a 50-1 shot.  


His draw is open through the Quarter Finals, with Kwoo being the first player who has the weapons to truly trouble him if he brings a decent level to Pune. From there, he would face Paire / Daniel, followed by Berankis / Sugita / Vesely in the final. Not exactly a murderer's row - there's a solid chance we find ourselves holding a +1500 ticket on a semi-final participant here.


Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Londero won this event last year in the midst of his breakout onto the ATP tour during the 2019 clay swing. Londero hits big ground strokes and can finish points from the baseline with a combination of power and the angles he can generate by stepping in to take the ball early. 

He’s won 65% of serve points on clay (vs Tour avg 62%) and won 38% of return points (avg 38.1%) in the past 1Y, holding serve 82.6% of the time (avg 76%) and broken serve in 22.2% of games (avg 24%), so this is clearly an above average clay court player with some serious weapons. Speed of the courts in Córdoba should suit his serve dominant profile, as the quicker conditions allow him to hit through the court and finish points with greater ease (it’s not surprising that he did well here in 2019 taking that into account).


Londero has stepped it up in big matches vs. higher ranked players in the past (Pella @ Córdoba, Gasquet @ Bastad, Basil x Gasquet x Moutet @ French Open) and will be playing in his home country this week. He’s shown the ability to make deep runs in the past on Clay: won Córdoba 2019, made R16 at French Open (lost to Nadal), made Final at Bastad (lost to Jarry), made R16 in Rio de Janeiro.



The draw looks gettable for him in the early going: R1 = Cecchinato, R2 = likely Dellien, R3 = either Djere / Baena, Semi Final = Schwartz, Final = likely Pella / Garin. He should have the upper hand up through the semi-finals, and where Schwartz and then either Pella / Garin would present his most difficult opponents. Looking at the data, Londero has the 2nd highest Points Dominance Ratio (Serve Delta vs Avg - Return Delta), ahead of both Garin and Schwartz but behind Pella. I think Londero goes deep here, and worst case we have a chance to place an EV+ hedge wager in the semi or final round pending the actual matchup he faces at that point.

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Tennis Picks 2/3 (Pune + Cordoba + Montpellier)

Only 1 match on our slate for Sunday but it cashed comfortably with Bagnis winning in straight sets. I am going to wrap that into results for Monday 2/3 since it was a standalone match. 

Looking at the draws for this week, first thing we should do is assess the surface conditions at all 3 events and scan the draws for notable players we might want to back on a future / match to match basis:

  • Pune plays at a higher altitude than most tournaments (500M / 1640 ft) and the courts / balls here have played fast in prior years. Sean Calvert points out that 56% of matches played at Pune over the last 2Y have featured a tiebreak, evidence of the serve friendly conditions. Further, Karlovic (very serve reliant) had great run here in 2019, making the final as a 50-1 shot - this drives home the importance of strong serving + attacking tennis at this event. Gerasimov + Stebe / Ivashka are names to watch on opposite sides of the draw
  • Córdoba plays at an altitude of over 400M / 1300ft, so it should profile as a faster clay court. It will be slower than the typical hard court, however, and the intricacies of movement + the heightened impact of spin on the dirt surface will need to be considered when making plays here. Good opportunity to attack some clay oriented floaters (players whose ranking is lower than their performance on Clay due to poor results on other surfaces. Delbonis, Ramos, Londero, Moutet and Sonego / Garin are names to watch behind the favorites as these guys are generally considered clay court grinders who have impressed on a relative basis while playing on sub optimal surfaces in recent months. Londero specifically can raise his game to a high level in stretches, and won this event last year. He is well rested and has raised his game a lot over the past year, putting up respectable + improving numbers through the hard swing despite that being a less than suitable surface for him. He’s likely the best value on the board at +2000 
  • Montpellier is an extremely fast indoor surface, and that tournament tends to be won by the higher seeded players in the draw. Not much value in the futures pool as a result, but Shapovalov looks like a strong shot to win given his strength on indoor hard courts and the fact that he’s probably well rested after an early exit in Australia.
Across the 3 draws, Schwartzman is the biggest standout as somebody who is head and shoulders above his draw. His outright / futures price is expensive, unfortunately, and there isn't much value there at +250 to win the tournament. I like Londero to do some damage this week - more on that below. 

Montpellier is a crowded field and historically plays out according to seeding so there is limited value there in a vig heavy futures pool.


Pune, on the other hand, features a weak draw leaves Paire as the likely favorite to win the title. Given how volatile he is as a player, that could present an excellent opportunity to attack some value further down the board in that draw - Gerasimov sticks out like a sore thumb taking all that into account. 


Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5

Egor Gerasimov is a player to keep an eye on, particularly in 3 set formats on faster hard courts. He is generally weaker than most re: fitness (this showed after a few matches at AO), but this hasn’t impacted him in the 3 set format. 

Gerasimov has a missile of a serve and features solid ground strokes and the ability to finish points at the net. He had a strong finish to 2019 on the latter portion of the hard court swing, and has the ability to get on the type of serve heater that could carry him deep into this tournament. At +1500, I'm willing to take a small shot at him to win this event. 


Pune at a higher altitude than most tournaments (500M / 1640 ft) and the courts / balls here have played fast in prior years. Sean Calvert points out that 56% of matches played at Pune over the last 2Y have featured a tiebreak, evidence of the serve friendly conditions. Further, Karlovic (another serve oriented missile) had great run here in 2019, making the final as a 50-1 shot.  


His draw is open through the Quarter Finals, with Kwoo being the first player who has the weapons to truly trouble him if he brings a decent level to Pune. From there, he would face Paire / Daniel, followed by Berankis / Sugita / Vesely in the final. Not exactly a murderer's row - there's a solid chance we find ourselves holding a +1500 ticket on a semi-final participant here.


Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Londero won this event last year in the midst of his breakout onto the ATP tour during the 2019 clay swing. Londero hits big ground strokes and can finish points from the baseline with a combination of power and the angles he can generate by stepping in to take the ball early. 

He’s won 65% of serve points on clay (vs Tour avg 62%) and won 38% of return points (avg 38.1%) in the past 1Y, holding serve 82.6% of the time (avg 76%) and broken serve in 22.2% of games (avg 24%), so this is clearly an above average clay court player with some serious weapons. Speed of the courts in Córdoba should suit his serve dominant profile, as the quicker conditions allow him to hit through the court and finish points with greater ease (it’s not surprising that he did well here in 2019 taking that into account).


Londero has stepped it up in big matches vs. higher ranked players in the past (Pella @ Córdoba, Gasquet @ Bastad, Basil x Gasquet x Moutet @ French Open) and will be playing in his home country this week. He’s shown the ability to make deep runs in the past on Clay: won Córdoba 2019, made R16 at French Open (lost to Nadal), made Final at Bastad (lost to Jarry), made R16 in Rio de Janeiro.


The draw looks gettable for him in the early going: R1 = Cecchinato, R2 = likely Dellien, R3 = either Djere / Baena, Semi Final = Schwartz, Final = likely Pella / Garin. He should have the upper hand up through the semi-finals, and where Schwartz and then either Pella / Garin would present his most difficult opponents. Looking at the data, Londero has the 2nd highest Points Dominance Ratio (Serve Delta vs Avg - Return Delta), ahead of both Garin and Schwartz but behind Pella. I think Londero goes deep here, and worst case we have a chance to place an EV+ hedge wager in the semi or final round pending the actual matchup he faces at that point.


Futures for Mon 2/3 - Sun 2/9 

Gerasimov to Win ATP Pune (+1500) $0.5 / $7.5
Londero to win ATP Córdoba (+2000) $0.5 / $10.0

Tennis Picks for Sun 2/2 - Mon 2/3 (2-0, +$2.0)

✅ Bagnis ML vs Gaio (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
✅Ruusuvuori ML x Sugita ML (-130) $1.3 / $1.0
Sonego -1.5 gm vs Balazs (-125) $1.25 / $1.0
Delbonis ML vs Cuevas (-140) $1.4 / $1.0
Delbonis -1.5 gm vs Cuevas (-110) $1.1 / $1.0



(6 AM) Emil Ruusuvuori vs Nicolas Mahut
Big mismatch here. Ruus is an up and comer, and should make his mark on the tour this year after smoking the Challenger circuit in 2019. He features a powerful serve and heavy groundstrokes, which will play well vs. Mahut as he hasn’t played a Hard Court singles match on the ATP Tour in over a year. Mahut plays a lot of doubles – he is likely to play a ton of serve / volley to force Ruus to make plays in order to beat him. Ruus has the passing shots to handle this easily, and I expect a routine victory for him.

(6:30 AM) Yuichi Sugita vs Thomas Fabbiano

Fabbiano comes in on a terrible run of form, winning 2 of his last 12 matches. He is not a particularly strong hard court player, and will struggle to handle the level of play Sugita brings into the contest. Sugita won a match in Australia and progressed to the final of the 2 other tournaments he entered in 2020 (Challenger, but he’s still in a good rhythm. These 2 met in 2017 on a Hard Court, with Sugita winning 57% of serve points vs only 44% for Fabbiano. Since then, Sugita has improved his level substantially while Fabianno is starting to look like he might retire sooner rather than later. Important to note that their Hard Court stats going into the previous meeting actually favored Fabbiano, making the dominant result in favor of Sugita all the more impressive (it indicates that even without the form disparity we see here, Sugita’s game has the ability to cause Fabianno serious problems within that specific matchup

(1:30 PM) Lorenzo Sonego vs Attila Balazs

Sonego has big edges in the data, holding serve +8% more often on 1Y stats normalized for opposition difficulty and +15% on the common opponent sub-sample. He has a slight edge on return point win % in both data samples, but this is more concentrated in the 6M data and that is a rather small sample size (i.e. I would assume they are about equal on return). These 2 also played a H2H in 2017, with Sonego winning 66% of serve points vs. 63% for Balazs. Sonego has improved his game a lot since that matchup and I get a forecast of about a +6% serve delta for Sonego accounting for the stat deltas from 2017 to 2019.

Combining all 3 models, I get a blended forecast of a +5.5% delta to Sonego, implying a 78% chance of winning a 3 set match (ML -360) and a 51% chance of winning in straight sets.


Sonego has a huge serve and his favorite surface is clay. Balasz tends to have strong rally tolerance, but lacks weapons and had already retired from the game a few years ago before now making a comeback. Sonego’s serve and ability to finish points from the baseline will allow him to win cheap points on serve and devote more energy to his return games. Balazs will be under pressure all day – Sonego moves on.



(5 PM) Federico Delbonis vs Pablo Cuevas
2 Clay court specialists going head to head here – this should be a hotly contested match as both players have semi-final ranking points to defend here (those points roll off 1Y after earning them, so whichever of these players fails to make it out of rd 1 will see their ranking take a hit).

Cuevas has an edge on 1Y Clay Court stats (+3.8% serve hold / -2.3% serve break) but that entire data sample occurred before July of 2019 as there have been mostly Hard Court and Grass court tournaments since then. In the interim, Cuevas’ level has fallen off a cliff (5-11 since US Open) and he looks to be persistently struggling with injuries.

I put more weight in the Common Opponent and recent H2H data, and that is where we see Delbonis with a massive edge. Against Common Opponents over the last 1Y, Delbonis wins +5% / +3.7% more 1st / 2nd serve points, and wins +9% / -3% more 1st / 2nd return points than Cuevas. These edges carried over into their most recent H2H at Bastad in July, with Delbonis taking a 6-4 / 6-4 straight set victory and winning 62% of serve points vs. just 53% for Cuevas. Cuevas only put 50% of his 1st serves in play during that match, roughly 10% below his tour average, and even accounting for that delta (re-simulating the match with the same serve win %’s for Cuevas but a higher 1st Serve in rate) yields a +5% serve delta for Delbonis (79% to win / ML = -370)

Within this matchup, Delbonis can leverage his heavy / high spin left handed forehand to bounce the ball up and away from Cuevas’ 1-handed backhand, putting pressure on that stroke throughout the match. We can see this dynamic has been a persistent issue for Cuevas as he has gone 3-5 vs. Left-Handers over the past year. Further, Delbonis has spectacular rally tolerance (he can play extremely long points with a high level on consistency), and this should serve him well on a slow surface against an opponent with questionable health / fitness.


My 3 models combined give Delbonis a 72% chance of winning (ML = -255) and a 42% chance of winning in 2 sets (-1.5 set = +135). I will attack the value on Delbonis by splitting my bet between ML and -1.5 game spread at 1 unit each